Sunil Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15386 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2020 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sunil Ram Son of Laldeo Ram Resident of Village - Mangurahan, P.s.- Govindganj, Distt.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-12-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 270 of 2020 lodged under Sections 302, 201/34 of the I.P.C.

As per the prosecution case, the informant has disclosed that marriage of his daughter was solemnized 12 years back with the petitioner, from whom 3 kids are there. On 29.07.2020 the informant received a message on his mobile phone that his daughter had left her house. Informant immediately went to his daughter's house and his maternal grand-son disclosed to him that his mother was killed by his father and his family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15386 of 2022(5) dt.22-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2020 having clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of filing of this case, charge has been framed. He also submits that other co-accused persons have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that as per the report charge has already been framed in this case and summons were issued to call all 6 charge-sheet witnesses. He also submits that petitioner is the husband and his other family members are on bail. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and this bail application is hereby rejected. Trial Court is directed to release the petitioner on bail 8 months after framing of charge, imposing its own conditions so that he may not evade his appearance during trial. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) ashishsingh/- U T