Rana Sanjeev Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48532 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Rana Sanjeev Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Arjun Prasad Singh, a resident of Village- Sant Nagar, P.S. and District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.203 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 363, 379, 384, 386, 406, 420, 327, 467 and 468/34 of the I.P.C.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he had lend the money a sum of Rs.11.60 lacs from the informant out of which he returned Rs.7.60 lacs through R.T.G.S. and now Rs.4/- lacs is due to be paid to the informant. It appears that earlier the petitioner was granted provisional bail by the court below on the undertaking that he will repay Rs.4/- lacs to the informant within
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48532 of 2017 (2) dt.08-11-2017 2/3 three months but he failed to do so.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had given Rs.9.10 lacs to the informant to purchase the land from before and upon demanding his money the present false case has been filed and, as such, he has been falsely implicated in this case.
Heard learned A.P.P. also as well as the informant who have drawn my attention to the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Judge whereby in term and condition that the petitioner will pay the outstanding dues to the informant and file money receipt before him. But the petitioner failed to repay the said dues. Hence, his bail petition was rejected. Aforesaid fact has been brought on the record by way of supplementary affidavit.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, to cut short the matter, learned trial court is directed that if the petitioner deposits a bank draft of Rs.2/- lacs in the court below, he will release him to his own satisfaction and that amount will be subject to the case of the court below and at the same time the learned trial court shall release the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48532 of 2017 (2) dt.08-11-2017 3/3 aforesaid amount in favour of the informant, if such undertaking is filed.
With this observation, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U