Ankit Nishant v. National Institute Of Open Schooling And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6428 of 2015 =========================================================== Ankit Nishant S/o Dr. Ajit Kumar Sharma West Patel Nagar, Adarsh Colony, Adarsh Path No. - 6A, Patna, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. National Institute of Open Schooling through the director National Institute of Open Schooling, A - 24/25, Sector, Noida.

2. The Director National Institute of Open Schooling, A - 24/25, Sector - 62, Noida.

3. The Deputy Director National Institute of Open Schooling, A - 24/25, Sector - 62, Noida.

4. The Regional Director National Institute of Open Schooling, Lalit Bhawan (Ground Floor), Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna - 800001. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Madan Prasad Singh No-2, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-06-2016 Learned counsel representing the National Institute of Open Schooling produces a Xerox copy of the result of the petitioner which has been declared earlier in the year 2014. It is also his submission that the result has been communicated to the centre to which the petitioner was attached. The petitioner should contact the centre on the basis of the Xerox copy which has already been handed over to the counsel for the needful.

Counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that testimonials in original deposited by the petitioner before the authorities of National Institute of Open Schooling should be

Patna High Court CWJC No.6428 of 2015 dt.24-06-2016 2 / 2 returned.

Counsel for the National Institute of Open Schooling informs the Court that there are certain regulations and rules which are in place with regard to such return. The authorities can only return what is returnable and they have obligation to withhold certain testimonials which cannot be returned.

Whatever the petitioner wants return of the original, he should write in specifics so that the authorities can decide on the request of the petitioner. Such decision must be taken within a period of eight weeks of the petitioner making the request. Writ application now stands disposed of in terms of the above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 28.06.2016 Transmission Date