Birendar Kaji @ Birender Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15183 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2379 Year-2013 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Birendar Kaji @ Birender Kumar S/O Bhoop Narayan Kaji Resident of Village- Bairiya Khurd, P.S.- Laukariya, Post- Harnatand, District- West Champaran (Bihar), (Director of M/S Real Bond Group Real Bond Marketing Ltd. and real Bond Building and Land Developers Pvt. Ltd.). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Niranjan Kumar S/O Indradeo Sao R/O Mohalla- Bhupatipur, P.O- delwa, P.S- Ram Krishna Nagar, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 406, 417, 418, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner has cheated the complainant by way of an assurance to double the amount in 29 months upon which the complainant gave Rs. 45 lac to the petitioner and later on he denied to return either the interest or the principal to him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15183 of 2025(2) dt.11-04-2025 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the entire prosecution story, it appears that it is purely a civil dispute and matter is regarding payment of money. Petitioner has been made scape goat in this case as the main accused are accused no. 2 to 4. Petitioner has already been served the sentence by remaining behind the bar for about more than four years and languishing in judicial custody since 3.1.2021.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 2379(C ) of 2013.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) sushma/- U T