Anjani Pal @ Anjani Kumar @ Anjani Kumar Pal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19755 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2024 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Anjani Pal @ Anjani Kumar @ Anjani Kumar Pal S/O Bhikhari Pal Resident of Village - Rajkhand, P.S- Samastipur Muffasil, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and this is the third attempt of the petitioner to seek regular bail.

4. The learned APP, at this stage, submits that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 26283 of 2024 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 21.06.2024 after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19755 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/3 considering the case on merits. It is further submitted that thereafter petitioner again moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32913 of 2025 and the same also came to be rejected by an order dated 20.06.2025, but then a liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of seven months.

5. On query of the Court from the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner with regard to the stage of the trial, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that all prosecution witnesses have been examined and the case for the last four months is at the stage of argument.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

7. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to ensure that the trial is concluded within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if what has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is true.

8. It is also directed that no unnecessary/undue adjournments be given in the trial.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19755 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 3/3

9. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands rejected.

10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Court.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T