Patna High CourtL.P.A/560/2016dismissed

Shashi Kapoor Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-22Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.560 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4331 of 2016 =========================================================== Shashi Kapoor Ravidas Son of Sri Dhanpat Ravidas, Resident of Village- Rasalpur , Police Station - Ekangarsarai, District Nalanda. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

3. The Bihar State Election Commission, through its Secretary, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Bihar State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

6. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

7. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sub Division Hilsa (Nalanda).

8. The Block Development officer, Ekangarsarai Block Sub Division Hilsa District Nalanda.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : None For the State : Mr. Ravi Verma, AC to GP4 For State Election Commission : Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate with Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) Date: 22-02-2017 The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to the location of booth for conduct of Panchayat election. We do not find any error in the order of the learned Single Bench as it is for the State Election Commission to decide as to at which place the booth for the voting has to be set up.

Patna High Court LPA No.560 of 2016 dt.22-02-2017 2/2 In view thereof, we do not find any merit in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The same is dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 01.03.2017 Transmission Date