Rohit Sahni @Rohit @ Bablu Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17446 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2014 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rohit Sahni @Rohit @ Bablu Sahni, Male, aged about 40 years, SON OF ALOK JEE @ MUSHAFIR SAHNI @ ANAND JEE Village Thathan Kajipur, P.S. -Sadar Hajipur, District -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vasant Vikas, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 427, 435, 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of the CLA Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is being member of unlawful banned organization involved in demanding ransom.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the name of the petitioner came on the basis of confessional statement by co-accused. He next submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66483 of 2018. Petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17446 of 2024(2) dt.21-03-2024 2/2 prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be directed to be released on bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No.35 of 2014 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Muzaffarpur with following conditions:- (I) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of court concerned. (ii) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the trial court. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T