Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35710 of 2017 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Son of Sri Gujo Yadav, R/o Station-Bounsi, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Shahkund P.S.Case No. 66 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 193, 420, 406 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he got a false case lodged regarding recovery of laptop and other articles and laptop was recovered from one Himanshu Kumar and he is in custody for more than three months.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner except the confessional statement of co-accused and that co-accused has been granted bail in Cr.Misc.No. 34046 of 2017, vide order dated 20.7.2017. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also considering the period of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35710 of 2017 (2) dt.08-08-2017 2/2 custody, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisifonal Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Shahkund P.S.Case No. 66 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U