Chitrasen Pandit @ Vinay v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 48720 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- 3731 Year- 2015 Thana- Complaint Case District- Patna ====================================================== Chitrasen Pandit @ Vinay, Son of Ram Briksh Pandit, R/o Village- Marhara, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Rabina Kumari W/o Sri Chitrasen Pandit @ Vinay, D/o Dharam Nath Pandit, R/o Village- Madhara, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda, at present residing at Village- Kurkuri, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

11-10-2017 Heard Sri Dhirendra Nath Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The present petition has been filed with a prayer to modify an order dated 01-07-2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21847 of 2017. By the said order, while granting bail to the petitioner, this Court had imposed certain conditions. The said order was passed on a petition filed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.").

Once, an order was passed by this Court, there is no reason to pass any order for altering any condition imposed by this Court. Had it been a case of clerical error or typographical

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48720 of 2017(2) dt.11-10-2017 2/2 mistake, I would have entertained it, but in view of Section 362 of the Cr.P.C., there is no question to pass any order, which amounts to review/recall of its own order.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T