Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34574/2017bail granted

Teshlal Tiwari @ Jai Ram Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34574 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34574 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2017 Thana -BADHAILA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Teshlal Tiwari @ Jai Ram Tiwari Son of Baduri Narayan Tiwary @ Badri Narayan, R/o Village- Siyawak, P.S.- Baghaila, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Murlidhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 354, 307, 447, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused person is of assault to the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant and his family members by the butt of pistol, however, injuries are not serious. Further there is case and counter case between the parties and petitioner has bee in judicial custody since 22.04.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five thousand)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34574 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -III, Sasaram (Rohtas), in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T