Ranvijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13810 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2015 Thana- AMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ranvijay Singh, Son of Lt. Rama Singh, Resident of Village- Khaira, Jiwa Bigha, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier thrice rejected vide orders dated 08.03.2016, 18.01.2017 and 30.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 54118 of 2015, Cr. Misc. No. 51720 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 39414 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2015 having no criminal antecedent, there is no eyewitness of the occurrence and only on the basis of suspicion the petitioner has been named. There was direction to conclude the trial within three months but up till now only one chargesheet witness has been examined and in near future there is no likelihood of the conclusion of the trial.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13810 of 2018(3) dt.04-04-2018 2/2 The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the trial has not been concluded within specified period.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-1, Aurangabad, in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 15 of 2015, arising out of Sessions Trial No. 348 of 2015/ 72 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T