Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37799/2017bail granted

Badri Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37799 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -173 Year- 2016 Thana -MAJHAHGARH District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Badri Ram Son of Ram Prit Ram, R/o Village- Madhu Sareya, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S.Case No.173 of 2016 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is father-in-law and the case is of dowry death.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, as nothing specific has been attributed against him and the mother-inlaw of the deceased has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail, vide order dated 19.5.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.13699 of 2017. The petitioner is in custody since 3.4.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37799 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S.Case No.173 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T