Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43709/2017bail granted

Jitesh Sah @ Jitesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43709 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43709 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2017 Thana -MAINATAND DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Jitesh Sah @ Jitesh Kumar, Son of Bachchu Sah, Resident of VillageGurubhawa, P.S.- Chanpatiya, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 51 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 87 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 07.06.2017 and other co-accused has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36141 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43709 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 51 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T