Ajay Thakur @ Babloo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14387 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2018 Thana- MEHANDIGANJ DistrictPatna ====================================================== Ajay Thakur @ Babloo aged about 25 years, male, Son of Late Ratan Thakur Resident of - Mansa Ram Ke Akhara, Loha ka Pool, P.S.- Mehandiganj, Distt - Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nityanand Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Mehandiganj P.S. Case No. 91 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the confessional statement of co-accused Ram Kumar Mehta, except which there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. There is no recovery of any incriminating goods from the possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused Sumit Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 783 of 2019. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14387 of 2019(2) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in connection with Mehandiganj P.S. Case No. 91 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T