Satrudhan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6491 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Satrudhan Singh, Son of Late Leela Singh, Resident of village- Gyanpur, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. D.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. S.P. Katihar.

4. Sergeant Major, Police Line Katihar.

5. Director, Rajbhasha Bihar Patna.

6. Accountant General Bihar Patna.

7. Senior Accounts Officer, Office of the Accountant General (A & E) Bihar Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Ebrahim Kabir Mrs. Shruti Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC11- Ashok Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-02-2016 It is evident from the stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit that they have all the intention to effect recovery against the petitioner, who is a retired Havildar of Bihar Police, of the benefit granted to him between the period 9.8.2000 till 1.7.2012 on the ground that petitioner has not passed Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination.

However, there is no order as such which has been passed in this regard because the same has neither been brought on record by the petitioner nor has been annexed with the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6491 of 2015 dt.08-02-2016 2/2 In view of the above, let the concerned respondent, who is Superintendent of Police, Katihar, pass an order with regard to the intent and purpose which they have expressed in the counter affidavit. Till such an order is passed, no recovery is required to be made. Writ stands disposed of with the above observation. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U