Punam Singh @ Priya Singh @ Sandhya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27155 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -262 Year- 2017 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Punam Singh @ Priya Singh @ Sandhya W/o Pawan Singh, Resident of Rambagh Dharhara, P.S.-Ara Town, District-Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(B), 27(A) and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner is daughter of co-accused, namely Sanjay Prasad. From the rented house of co-accused Sanjay Prasad 100 grams of heroin like substance was allegedly recovered. Submission is that Sanjay Prasad has already been allowed bail by this Court vide order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26100 of 2018 considering the period of custody of Sanjay Prasad as well as non-compliance of mandates of Section 50 of the NDPS Act at the time of seizure. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27155 of 2018 (2) dt.07-05-2018 2/2 above named, who is a female, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017 arising out of Ara Nawada Police Station Case No. 262 of 2017, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/Sanjeev U T