Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14151 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2018 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR Son of Pappu Sah Resident of village-Marhowrah Garh Devi Chowk, Kanu Tola, P.S.- Marhowrah, District- Saran... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR.................................... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Harsh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 18-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 569 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is said to have snatched the bag of the informant and when the informant approached him for her bag, he forcibly took her to the bush, teased her in order to outrage her modesty and also made the photography of the same and threatened to upload on the net.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioner has no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. He has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of his enemies. Mother of the informant is in habit of lodging of such type of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14151 of 2019(4) dt.18-06-2019 2/2 cases against several other persons at the behest of their rivalry taking money. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner and his father runs a shop near Garh Devi temple. They had refused to oblige members of the temple committee to accord the articles free of cost, who have implicated the petitioner in the case through the informant in order to harass him. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
The learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Saran in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 569 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) T.Kr./- U T