Devan Yadav And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20119 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -218 Year- 2014 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Devan Yadav, Son of Late Natai Yadav
2. Yogendra Yadav, Son of Late Natai Yadav
3. Shyam Sundar Yadav, Son of Late Natai Yadav
4. Raghunandan Yadav, Son of Late Natai Yadav
5. Saken Yadav @ Siken Yadav, Son of Shivan Yadav
6. Amrendra Yadav, Son of Shivan Yadav
7. Mantu Yadav, Son of Shivan Yadav
8. Sanjay Yadav, Son of Devan Yadav
9. Anil Yadav, Son of Shyam Sundar Yadav
10. Ranjay Yadav, Son of Shivan Yadav All are residents of Village - Tamua, P.S. Chatapur, Distt. Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Gulnar Begum (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2015 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.2 Yogendra Yadav has already been taken into custody. Hence, his bail application has now become infructuous.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner Nos.1 and 3 to 10 are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.218 of 2014 for allegedly having committed the offences under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 447, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20119 of 2015 (2) dt.25-06-2015 2/2 the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a history of land disputes between the parties in which both the parties are litigating since long. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that it was only on account of the said land disputes that some altercation took place between the parties.
However, considering the nature of allegations and a history of litigations and also the fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, let petitioner Nos.1 and 3 to 10, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.218 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T