Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16341 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-652 Year-2022 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

PINTU KUMAR @ PINTU YADAV SON OF RAMESH YADAV R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- HARDAWAN, P.S.- DOBHI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR-824201 2.

MANTU KUMAR @ MANTU YADAV SON OF RAMESH YADAV R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- HARDAWAN, P.S.- DOBHI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR-824201 3.

GOPAL YADAV SON OF MOHAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- HARDAWAN, P.S.- DOBHI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR-824201 4.

SAMRA YADAV @ SAMARU YADAV @ SOMARU YADAV SON OF MOHAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- HARDAWAN, P.S.- DOBHI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR-824201 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anmol Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 342, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that they forcibly entered into the house of the informant and abused and assaulted the informant's side and also to threatened to kill them. It is alleged that the petitioners snatched ornaments from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16341 of 2023(2) dt.23-06-2023 2/3 daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of their enemies. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties and both sides are agnates. He further submits that the injuries are found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16341 of 2023(2) dt.23-06-2023 3/3 connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No.652 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T