← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14245/2025bail granted

Subodh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-19Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14245 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Subodh Kumar S/o Parikha Varma R/o Village- Kaudi, PS- Khiri Mor, DisttPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no.44 of 2025 registered for the offences under sections 303(2), 317(2), 338 and 336(3) of the B.N.S, 2023.

3. A perusal of the F.I.R would show that the police team apprehended the petitioner along with a motorcycle and when the documents were demanded, he was unable to produce any kind document of ownership. On verification, it was found that the said motorcycle was a stolen vehicle.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner had purchased the said motorcycle from someone on assurance to give the owner book of the said motorcycle and he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14245 of 2025(2) dt.20-03-2025 2/2 did not have any knowledge that the said motorcycle which he had purchased was stolen. The petitioner is in custody since 19.01.2025 and he has two criminal antecedents.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner has two other criminal antecedents but it has been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the petition that both the cases have been lodged on the account of family dispute and the petitioner is on bail in both the cases.

6. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no.44 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T