Navin Kumar @ Navin Upadhyay v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25994 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-839 Year-2020 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Navin Kumar @ Navin Upadhyay Son of Sri Ram Hulash Upadhyay R/O Village- Baishadih, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR ORAL ORDER 08-12-2021 The applicant/accused in Crime No. 839 of 2020 registered with Ara Nawada Police Station for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act, at the instance of the first informant, by this application is seeking his release on bail during pendency of the trial. The FIR came to be lodged by the police station officer of police station Ara Nawada. It is alleged in the FIR that on the basis of secret information, raid was conducted at Railway Line near Maharana Pratap Nagar. It is averred that five accused persons came to be arrested from the spot and the applicant was stated to be in possession of a country made pistol with one live cartridge.

The investigation of the crime in question is already over. Hence, further pre-trial detention of the applicant is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25994 of 2021(2) dt.08-12-2021 2/2 warranted, therefore, the order.

The application is allowed.

The applicant/accused in Crime No. 839 of 2020 registered with Ara Nawada. Police Station is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) on furnishing sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the following conditions:- (I) The applicant/accused should not extend any threat, promise of inducement to the persons acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (II) The applicant/accused should not repeat the trial in expeditious disposal of the trial against him. (III) The applicant to remove all office objections forthwith and the Registry to issue bail-writ as per this order only after removal of office objections by the applicant/accused. (A. M. Badar, J) Ravi/- U T