Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15269/2019bail granted

Ram Ekbal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-01Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15269 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2019 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== RAM EKBAL SINGH, Male, aged about 67 years, Son of Late Sahdev Singh Resident of Village- Nimaithi, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 50.625 m.l. illicit liquor from the wood shop of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 27.01.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15269 of 2019(2) dt.01-04-2019 2/2 case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with G.O. Case No. 96 of 2019, arising out of Behari P.S. Case No. 20 of 2019, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T