Ramanand Tudu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1168 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Araria ====================================================== Ramanand Tudu SON OF LATE CHOTELAL TUDU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 01, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTTARARIA ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.
BIRESH YADAV SON OF KISHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 3.
NARESH YADAV SON OF KISHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 4.
KISHAN YADAV NA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 5.
SINGHESHWAR YADAV SON OF BACCHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARPATGANJ REWAHI WARD NO. 10, PS- NARPATGANJ, DIST- ARARIA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Md. Ziaul Quamar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State.
2. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 10-10-2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Araria by which, the learned court below though took cognizance in this case against opposite party Nos. 4 & 6 but the court below having found no material against opposite party Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7, exonerated them from the case.
3. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1168 of 2024(5) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 the cognizance has been taken by the learned court below against two accused persons; (1) Parmeshwar Yadav and (2) Ramesh Yadav since the witnesses have taken their names. The names of respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7 were not found place in the statement of witnesses and that is why, they have been exonerated from the array of the accused.
4. I do not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T