Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40970/2017bail granted

Tarun Kumar Yadav @ Tarun Kr. Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40970 of 2017 (2) dt.06-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40970 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -226 Year- 2017 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Tarun Kumar Yadav @ Tarun Kr. Yadav Son of Prasad Yadav, R/o Village- Gonaha, P.S.- Tribeniganj, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.226 of 2017, registered for offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of black marketing of the rice of PDS system or mid-day mill system. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not a P.D.S. dealer nor anyway concerned with rice and he has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion and now he is in custody for three months having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40970 of 2017 (2) dt.06-09-2017 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.226 of 2017, with following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) S.Kumar/- U T