Indrajeet Rai @ Indrajit Yadav @ Jhilam v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41821 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41821 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -NANHPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. INDRAJEET RAI @ INDRAJIT YADAV @ JHILAM Son of Late Pragash Rai, R/o Village- Koili, P.S.- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 8 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of recovery of one stolen motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner he has falsely been implicated in this case at the instance of the police. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 09.01.2017 and so far other criminal antecedent is concerned, he is on bail in those cases. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pupri at Sitamarhi, in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41821 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 No. 8 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall mark his attendance in the concerned police station in the first week of each month till conclusion of trial so that the police may watch his conduct during trial.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T