Mandi Ranjan Choubey @ Mani Ranjan Choubey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25325 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -279 Year- 2017 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Mandi Ranjan Choubey @ Mani Ranjan Choubey, son of Ramakant Choubey, resident of Village- Bhadarshila, P.S.- Shivsagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kuma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2017 in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No.279 of 2017 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was apprehended with one mobile phone and it is alleged that the said mobile had been snatched from the informant. It is further submitted that till date, the petitioner has not been placed on T.I. Parade and the identification of the item so recovered has also not been made.

Taking into consideration such facts and circumstances and the period of custody, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25325 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No.279 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be the father of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T