Satguru Sharan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47566 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2017 Thana -AMAS District- GAYA ====================================================== Satguru Sharan, aged about 37 Years, son of Sri Badri Prasad, R/o VillageSeren Dag, Post-Seren Dag, P.S.- Herhanj, District- Latehar (Jharkhand) at present residing at Mohalla Sundar Nagar, P.S.- Pandra, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunit Kumar Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pronati Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 132 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 560 litres of liquor from Bolero vehicle of the petitioner. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is driver of the vehicle and has nothing to do with the seized articles. Further submission is that he is in custody for more than three months having no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned APP also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47566 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of recovery of huge quantity of liquor, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
However, once charge has been framed in this case or petitioner completes five months period in judicial custody, whichever is earlier, the court below will release the petitioner on bail to its own satisfaction, if an application for bail is filed on behalf of petitioner, on the conditions that one of the bailors shall be a local having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court and if involvement of petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the above observation, this application is disposed of.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U