Patna High CourtCWJC/12628/2013dismissed

Jawahar Lal Sah And ORS v. Satya Narayan Sah And ORS

2016-09-29Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.12628 of 2013 (3) dt.29-09-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12628 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Jawahar Lal Sah Son Of Late Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

2. Panna Lal Sah Son Of Late Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

3. Sawan Kumar Sah Son Of Late Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

4. Gita Debi Daughter Of Late Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

5. Anita Debi Daughter Of Late Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

6. Rekha Devi D/O Late Jai Kishun Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Satya Narayan Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Mewa Lal Chowk, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

2. Ram Kumar Sah Son Of Late Bishwanath Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

3. Ishwar Lal Sah Son Of Late Bishwanath Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

4. Prakash Sah Son Of Late Bishwanath Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea

5. Meena Devi D/O Late Bishwanath Sah Resident Of Mohalla - Bari Hat, P.S. K. Hat, District - Purnea .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents.

This application is directed against the order dated 11.06.2013 passed in Title Appeal No. 13 of 2009, whereby the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Purnea allowed the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12628 of 2013 (3) dt.29-09-2016 application of the defendant/appellant/respondent nos. 1 to 5 filed under Order 26 Rule 10(A) of C.P.C. for comparing the admitted and disputed signature of defendants-respondents by appointing the handwriting expert.

On going through the impugned order, I do not find any illegality amounting to abuse of process of Court for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shail/- U