Anil Pandey @ Anil Kumar Pandey And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22802 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2015 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Anil Pandey @ Anil Kumar Pandey son of Indradeo Pandey @ Chandradeo Pandey, resident of village- Barki Karari, P.S.- Krahgahar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram) currently resident of P.S.- Katra Kotwali, Zila Karagar, Mirzapur, District- Mirzapur, State- U.P.

2. Upendra Pandey son of Late Lalji Pandey resident of village- Barki Karari, P.S.- Krahgahar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case instituted under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant Anil Singh had filed a written report before Kargahar Police Station stating therein that all the accused persons were enjoying Holi Song loudly on sound box, which was objected by the informant and his family members. On this objection all accused persons assaulted the informant brutally who sustained grievous injury.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22802 of 2015 (3) dt.03-09-2015 2/2 petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. General and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioners. No injury has been attributed against the petitioners. It is further submitted that due to village politics, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. No motive has been assigned against the petitioners for committing the alleged offence. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the FIR.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kargahar P.S.Case No. 60 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T