← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/765/2019disposed

Sunil Furniture, Through Its Proprietor, Sunil Mahto v. The Regional Manager, Syndicate Bank And ORS

2020-02-05Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.765 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1149 of 2019 ====================================================== Sunil Furniture, Through Its Proprietor, Sunil Mahto aged about 32 years, male, son of Kashawar Mahto, resident of Village- Sarai, P.O. Maner, P.S. Maner Sarai, District- Patna, at Present residing at Mohalla- Bakarganj, Near Shiv Mandir, P.S. Kadamkuan, Patna- 800004, Town and District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Regional Manager, Syndicate Bank and Ors Regional Office, Frazer Road, Patna- 800001 namely P.B. Chakravarty.

2.

The Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank Saidpur Branch, Maa Bhawani Palace, Opposite Uday Palace, Govind Mitra Road, Patna- 800004, namely Alok Sir.

3.

The Reserve Bank of India through its General Manager South Gandhi Maidan, Patna, namely Sri R.L.Das 4.

The Union of India through the Director of Prime Minister Employment Generation Programme, Khadi and Village Commission, Ministry of Micor, Small and Midium Enterprises, Gramodaya, 3rd IRIA Road, Vile Parle, West Mumbai- 400056, namely U.K. Baramtikar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the U.O.I.

:

Mr.Kumar Priya Ranjan, C.G.C.

For the Syndicate Bank :

Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate For the R.B.I.

:

Mr. Amish Kumar, J.C. to Sri K.K. Jha.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-02-2020 In view of the communication as contained in letter dated 16.05.2019 as contained in Annexure 'F' and another communication dated 20.05.2019 as contained in Annexure 'H' to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 1, this Court finds no reason to proceed with the contempt application.

Patna High Court MJC No.765 of 2019(2) dt.05-02-2020 2/2 This contempt application is, thus, dropped. The petitioner is always at liberty to challenge the communications, if so advised.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U