Bhola Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24552 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2016 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura ====================================================== Bhola Ram S/o Nathun Ram, R/o Vill.- Gawai, P.S.- Sheikhpura, DistrictSheikhpura at present Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Onama, P.S.- Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sheikhopursarai P.S. case no. 86 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 419, 420, 468 and 472/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
A written report was filed against this petitioner that he did not deposit folder with regard to selected panchayat Teachers along with merit list. The police after investigation found no evidence against this petitioner and submitted final form but the learned Court below has taken cognizance against this petitioner also. Learned counsel for the petitioner has annexed the certified copy of the final form submitted by the police as well as the cognizance order vide Annexure-2 and 3 to the bail petition.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24552 of 2018(2) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sheikhopursarai P.S. case no. 86 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1, Sheikhpura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T