Rana Rajiv Raman @ Rajiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2596 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Rana Rajiv Raman @ Rajiv Kumar Singh Son of Late Arun Kuamr Sinha Village + p.O - Pakara, P.S- Navgachhiya, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary Health and Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Health and Social Welfare (Aids Control) Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Additional Project Director, Bihar Aids Control Society , Shekhpura, Patna-800014.
4. The Assistant Director (S.T.D) Health and Social Welfare (Aids Control) Department Government of Bihar, Shekhpura, Patna.
5. The Chairman of Staring Commitee, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and hospital , Bhaglapur.
6. Sri Krishna Kumar Son of Not Known Resident of Villge + Post Barhounda, P.S- Haveli Kharagur, District - Munger. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhim Sen Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Binita Singh, G.P. 31. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 27-04-2015 The petitioner wants quashing of Annexure-12 which is an order of communication to the petitioner rejecting his claim for appointment as Counselor for S.T.D. The terms and conditions of the advertisement laid down various eligibility not only with regard to the subject but also with regard to the experience. No doubt, in order to support the persons with H.I.V. or AIDS working experience of one year in the field of H.I.V. and AIDS has been provided for but the finding is that the petitioner has no experience of that work in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.2596 of 2015 (4) dt.27-04-2015 area and that was the reason for his non-selection. The above position indicated in Annexures-12 has further been expanded and explained in the counter affidavit. If the petitioner has no minimum of eligibility, his non-selection which too on a contractual basis, cannot be said to be arbitrary and requires interference by this Court.
This writ application is, thus, dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Amin/- U