Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25393 of 2018 (2) dt.15-05-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25393 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2015 Thana -BARIYARPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kr. S/o Vihari Das, R/o Vill.- Sitarampur Nazira, P.S.- Bariarpur, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2018 in connection with Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 46 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and he has not named in the FIR as such no allegation has been made against him. The petitioner's case stands on better footing than co-accused Karan Singh and Tulsi Singh who are named in the FIR and have been granted bail by this Court. Similarly situated coaccused has Surendra Singh who is said to have sitting in 'Panchayati' along with the petitioner has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 24478 of 2018. The petitioner claims clean antecedents..

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25393 of 2018 (2) dt.15-05-2018

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Munger in connection with Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 46 of 2015 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T