Mohmood Alam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVIEW No.57 of 2019 In Letters Patent Appeal No.79 of 2018 ====================================================== Mohmood Alam S/o Late Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Mohalla-Pokhara Madhuban Colany, Ward no.5, P.S.-Hajipur Town, District-Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar.
3.
The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.
The Nagar Parishad Hajipur through the Chief Executive Officer, DistrictVaishali at Hajipur. 5.
The Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
6.
Khursid Alam @ Md. Khursid, S/o Late Abdul Jabbar, resident of MohallaMufti Mohalla, Town thana road, P.S. Nagar Hajipur, District- Vaishali, at present resident of Mohalla- Pokhra, Madhuban Colony, Ward No. 5, P.S. Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rakesh Ambastha, A.C. to A.A.G.-07 For Resp. No. 4 and 5 :
Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
The compromise on the basis whereof the judgement has been challenged is sought to be questioned on the
Patna High Court C. REV. No.57 of 2019(3) dt.15-07-2019 2/2 ground that, firstly, the applicant is not bound by any such compromise and, secondly, the said compromise cannot form the basis of an adjudication of the dispute.
Learned counsel for the applicant has advanced his submissions in the shape of re-hearing of the entire matter which is impermissible.
We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record. The review application is, accordingly, rejected. (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U