← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17247/2026dismissed

Punam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-282 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17247 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2023 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== Punam Devi W/O Sanjit Sah D/o. Rajendra Sah, resident of village- Maha Nagar, P.O.-Sarhara, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan, Presently residing at village- Ganga Kanhauli, P.O. and P.S.- Jalalpur, District-Saran at Chapra841412. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sanjit Sah Son of Late Asharfi Sah Resident of Ganga Kanhauli, P.O. and P.S.-Jalalpur, District- Saran at Chapra-841412. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 09.09.2025 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Saran at Chapra in Complaint Case No. 404 of 2023 corresponding to T.R. No. 2415 of 2024.

3. Perused the records.

4. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17247 of 2026(3) dt.28-07-2026 2/2 supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

6. However, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur is directed to conclude the Maintenance Case No. 184 of 2026, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Samastipur through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T