Sudhir Kumar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.766 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16579 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.

Sudhir Kumar Singh and anr son of Late Brahamdeo Singh R/o Village and P.O. Kathdumar, P.S. Simribakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. 2.

Thakur Dilip Kumar Son of Sri Bisheshwar Prasad Singh resident of Village and P.O. Bhabhani, P.S. Gamaharia, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sri R.K. Mahajan Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

Kumar Binod Narayan Singh Director Secondary Education Bihar Patna New Secretariat Patna.

4.

Sri H.R. Sriniwas Joint Secretary Department of Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

5.

Kumari Shailja Sharma, District Magistrate Saharsa. 6.

Rajesh Kumar Singh Deputy Development Commissioner Saharsa. 7.

Dr. Taqiuddin Ahmed District Education Officer Saharsa. 8.

Rahul Chandra Chaudhary District Programme Officer Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Diwakar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh AC to G.P. 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard the parties.

Show cause on behalf of the Zila Parishad, Saharsa has already been filed.

The writ application i.e. CWJC No. 16579 of 2014 of the petitioners was disposed of with a direction to consider the case of the petitioners in terms of the order dated 06-09-2010 passed in CWJC No. 682 of 2010. CWJC No. 682 of 2010 was

Patna High Court MJC No.766 of 2019(4) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 disposed of with certain directions which was subject to SLP pending before the Apex Court. The Apex Court ultimately passed the final order dated 26-02-2016 (Vide Annexure-B) in Civil Appeal No. 673 of 2016. After disposal of the said SLP, nothing is left for this court to look into and hence no order need to be passed.

If so advised, the petitioners may file fresh writ application for redressal of their grievance. With the aforesaid observation, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T