Garjan Nat And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16042 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2018 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Garjan Nat, Son of Hari Narayan Nat Resident of Village - Bhikharidih, P.S.- Nokha (Dharampura), District - Rohtas (Bihar). 2.
Lalan Nat Son of Hari Narayan Nat Resident of Village - Bhikharidih, P.S.- Nokha (Dharampura), District - Rohtas (Bihar). 3.
Raju Nat Son of Hari Narayan Nat Resident of Village - Bhikharidih, P.S.- Nokha (Dharampura), District - Rohtas (Bihar). 4.
Sanjay Nat Son of Hari Narayan Nat Resident of Village - Bhikharidih, P.S.- Nokha (Dharampura), District - Rohtas (Bihar). 5.
Saroj Nat Son of Garjan Nat Resident of Village - Bhikharidih, P.S.- Nokha (Dharampura), District - Rohtas (Bihar).
6.
Phurani Nat @ Phutani Nat Son of Garjan Nat Resident of Village - Bhikharidih, P.S.- Nokha (Dharampura), District - Rohtas (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ramanuj Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.C. Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, in short, is that while the informant was on the way, the accused persons surrounded him and assaulted due to which he sustained injury.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16042 of 2019(2) dt.14-03-2019 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is a case and counter case between the parties. A free fight is alleged to have taken between the parties. The injury on the accused side has not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Nokha (Dharampura) P.S. Case No. 241 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T