Patna High CourtCWJC/20241/2013dismissed

Sanjay Kumar v. United Bank Of India And ORS

2015-03-20Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20241 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Sanjay Kumar Son Of Late Ram Vilash Singh Resident Of Mohalla Ganipur, Near Tirhut Academy, Aghoria Bazar, Muzaffarpur, P.S. Kazi Mohammadpur, P.O. Ramna In The Town And District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. United Bank Of India Having Its Registered Office At 11, Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata-1

2. Chief Manager, Disciplinary And Industrial Relation Division, United Bank Of India, 11 Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata- 1

3. Deputy General Manager, Human Resources Management And Appellate Authority, United Bank Of India, 11 Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata- 1

4. Assistant General Manager, Human Resources Management And Disciplinary Authority, United Bank Of India, 11 Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata- 1

5. Chief Manager, Establishment Department, United Bank Of India, Head Office At Kasar Branch, P.S. Kasar, District- Buxar

6. Branch Manager, United Bank Of India, Hajipur Branch, P.S. Hajipur, Vaishali

7. Branch Manager, United Bank Of India, Kanti Branch, P.S. Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Upadhyay For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kailash Behari Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2015 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Bank, I am not satisfied that this is a case for any interference. The petitioner was alleged to have temporarily embezzled certain money. Upon that charge a

Patna High Court CWJC No.20241 of 2013 (2) dt.20-03-2015 2 / 2 departmental proceeding being initiated, he was compulsorily retired. His appeal has been dismissed. In judicial review the Court does not sit as a appellate court; it only looks into the decision making process. There is no aberration. The writ application merits no consideration and dismissed as such.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) B.Roy/- U