← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4382/2022disposed

Lalan Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar,

2024-01-22Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4382 of 2022 ====================================================== Lalan Kumar, Son of Late Gugul Kamat, Resident of Village - Hardi Tola, Chaughara, Ward No. 09, P.O. - Hardi, P.S. and District - Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate - Cum - Collector - Cum - District Election Officer (Gram Panchayat Election), District - Supaul. 4.

The Block Development Officer - Cum - Returning Officer, at Gram Panchayat Election, District - Supaul.

5.

The State Election Commission through its Secretary, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

6.

The Secretary, State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

7.

Smt. Dipika Sarkar, Wife of Dhrampal Kumar, Resident of Village - Lakshminia, P.O. - Hardi, Gram Panchayat - Hardi Purab, District - Supaul, Elected Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat - Hardi Purab, District - Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Archana Meenakshee (Gp6) Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, AC to GP 6 For the SEC :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-01-2024 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Ms. Archana Meenakshee, learned GP 6 along with Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, learned AC to GP 6 for the State and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, learned counsel for the SEC.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4382 of 2022(3) dt.22-01-2024 2/2 petitioner submits that he has been informed by the petitioner that he wants to avail the remedy before the Caste Scrutiny Committee, for the relief as prayed for in the present writ petition and thereafter subject to the result of the committee's finding, he seeks to approach the competent authority.

3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U