Ravi Ranjan Singh @ Ravi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26347 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-748 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAVI RANJAN SINGH @ RAVI YADAV SON OF ASHOK SINGH @ ASHOK YADAV R/O VILLAGE- LALA ATIMI, P.S- NASRIGANJ , DISTROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-09-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 414/ 34 IPC and sections 25(I-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. One loaded automatic pistol, five live cartridges and one mobile were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2020. Charge sheet has already been submitted.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26347 of 2021(3) dt.13-09-2021 2/2 bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this bail application is allowed. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case no. 748/2020 on the following conditions.
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T