← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17679/2025bail granted

Viplav Kumar @ Viplav Kumar Yadav @ Viplav Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-17Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17679 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2024 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Viplav Kumar @ Viplav Kumar Yadav @ Viplav Yadav S/O Hari Madhav Yadav R/O Village- Malodha, P.S- Basnahi, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 47/2024 dated 20.02.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants ridden on a motorcycle are alleged to have looted Rs. 4.5 lacs from the informant on the point of pistol. Further, it is alleged that they also took away the informant mobile phone and his motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17679 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up during the course of investigation. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. The co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 12.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51324/2024. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner was involved in the alleged offence which is evident from the confessional statement of the co-accused, Mukesh Kumar mentioned in para 53 of the case diary. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17679 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 3/3 satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Khagaria, in connection with Beldour P.S. Case No. 47/2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T