← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48286/2017bail granted

Gurudeo Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48286 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -454 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Gurudeo Paswan, son of Lakhan Paswan

2. Bholu Kumar, son of Hira Soni, Both resident of Village- Sri Ram Nagar, Chanmari, P.S. Dhansar, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sameer Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

This is an application for bail in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 454/2017 registered for the offences punishable under sections 30(a), 38, 47 of the Bihar Excise Act. Allegation against the petitioners is of recovery of 171 litres of liquor from the vehicle of the petitioners and they were arrested at the spot alongwith other co-accused. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners are only passenger of the vehicle and they are in custody for two months having no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupess

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48286 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 454/2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties in the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(ii) If involvement of the petitioners in such type of cases is found in future, their bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Surendra/- U