Rajnikant Pravin @ Bouajee @ Rajnikant Praveen v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15800 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2022 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Rajnikant Pravin @ Bouajee @ Rajnikant Praveen Son Of Awadhesh Singh @ Abdhesh Singh R/O Village- Pabra, Ward No.02, P.S.- Cheriya Bariyarpur, (MANJHAUL O.P.), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kalyan Shankar For the Informant :
Mr. Randhir Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 307, 386, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioner is that on the direction of this petitioner the F.I.R. named accused persons had demanded extortion of Rs. one Lac from the informant and in case of non-fulfillment of demand of extortion money, the F.I.R. named accused persons had threatened to the informant to murder.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15800 of 2023(2) dt.17-05-2023 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that there is delay in lodging the FIR. He submits that after investigation police has submitted final form against the petitioner but the learned court below differed the final form and taken cognizance against the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant oppose prayer for anticipatory bail and submit that process under Section 82 of the Cr. P.c. has been issued against the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, arguments of the parties and perusal of the record, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15800 of 2023(2) dt.17-05-2023 3/3 with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T