Tusi Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45794 of 2017 (3) dt.10-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45794 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2017 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. TUSI YADAV @ BISHUNDEO YADAV Son of Late Banbari Yadav, R/o Village- Tahwa, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is father in law of the deceased and allegation against him is causing death of the deceased. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner, who is father in law of the deceased and as a matter of fact she died in railway accident. Further petitioner has been in judicial custody since 29.06.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45794 of 2017 (3) dt.10-10-2017 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamui, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T