Patna High CourtCR. REV./832/2017dismissed

Shyam Kishore Bishkarma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2022-12-19Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.832 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Shyam Kishore Bishkarma son of Late Ramdhari Mistri, resident of villageDurgapur, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda, at present Resident of MohallaNew Area Kali Mandir, Nawada, P.S. and District-Nawada ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.State Of Bihar.

2.Chinta Devi daughter of Cheru Mistiri, resident of Village-Rani Hatti, Near Middle School Aati, P.S. Kadirganj, District- Nawada. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the State :

Ms. Pronati Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 Once again no one appears for the petitioner to press this application. Ms. Pronati Singh, learned APP for the State is present. On 15.12.2022 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

This Court has perused the impugned judgment. It appears on perusal thereof that in the family court even as the husband-opposite party appeared and filed his reply but in course of evidence he did not lead any evidence. The evidence of the applicant-wife and her witnesses remained uncontroverted. No dispute is there on the point that the applicant is legally wedded wife of the O.P. The applicant has laid evidence to the effect that the opposite party has performed a second marriage and thereafter he is not taking care of the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.832 of 2017(3) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 applicant-wife. The O.P. is working as a government driver and is earning salary.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, this Court finds that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada has not committed any error. The amount of maintenance awarded to the applicant-wife is a meager sum of Rs. 2,000/- per month which needs no interference.

This revision application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U