Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Sao v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15480 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2021 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Sao Son of Ram Padarath Sao Resident of Village- Ramchandrapur, P.S.- Piparia, Distt.- Lakhisarai, At present residing at 967/C, Ward No. 7, Mehrauli Delhia ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 258 of 2021 dated 13.11.2021 registered for the offences u/ss 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have fired on the informant and his brother and also assaulted them with pistol and iron rod due to that they got severely injured.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15480 of 2025(2) dt.09-05-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is land dispute between the parties. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. As per the injury report, the injured sustained no fire arm injury. The injured, Ramanand Singh sustained injuries caused by hard and blunt substance and the injury Nos. 1, 4 and 5 are simple in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 27.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43740/2023. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that two injuries are grievous in nature.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the material available on the record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Lakhisarai in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15480 of 2025(2) dt.09-05-2025 3/3 connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 258 of 2021, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T