← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6292/2019dfd for non appearance

Amit Chandra Roy v. The Union Of India

2022-10-18The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6292 of 2019 ====================================================== Amit Chandra Roy Son of Late Ram Babu Roy R/o Singhi Dalan, Police Station-Khaje Kalan, Patna City, District-Patna-8 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India 2.

The Chief Post Master General, Bihar Hardinge Road, Veerchand Patel Road, Patna (Bihar) 3.

The Senior Superintendent of Post Bankipur Post Office, Pirbahore, P.S.- Pirbahore, District-Patna 4.

The Post Master Jhauganj Post Office, Patna City, P.S.-Khaje Kalan, Patna-8 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Dr. K.N. Singh (ASG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 18-10-2022 Petitioner has prayer for following relief(s) : - "For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay remaining amount due to the petitioner worth Rs.4,46,371/- with 8 % interest since 04.12.2017 to till the date of payment followed by penalty and litigation cost as his father has deposited substantial amount under P.P.F. Scheme with Jhauganj Post Officer, Patna City, Patna or pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

On 17.10.2022, we had passed the following order:

Patna High Court CWJC No.6292 of 2019(3) dt.18-10-2022 2/2 "Despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, matter is adjourned.

List on 18.10.2022, in the category of "Order Matters"."

Even today, despite repeated calls and pass over, none appears for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that petition has become infructuous. It is, perhaps, for this reason that no one is coming forward.

Petition is dismissed for default.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/-DKS U