Sharukh Khan @ Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16079 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2021 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== SHARUKH KHAN @ RANJEET YADAV S/o- Krishna Bhagwan @ Bhagwan Yadav Resident of Village- Mahalpar, Khaira Bad, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saroj Kumar Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 452, 379, 504, 506, 384/34, 337, 338 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner and 3-4 unknown persons, armed with deadly weapons, attacked the house of informant and made indiscriminate firing. They are also alleged to have entered in the house and took out Rs. 50,000/- cash and some ornaments. The accused persons are also alleged to have demanded Rs. 5,00,000/-, as Rangdari, from the informant.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Prior to lodging of this case, the father of petitioner lodged a case against sons of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16079 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 informant, vide Bihar P.S. Case No. 755 of 2020 and only with a view to take revenge, this false case has been lodged by the informant. As a matter of fact, petitioner is driver and on the alleged date, he was at Gaya. Though, there is allegation of indiscriminate firing, but nobody sustained any fire-arm injury. So far as allegation of loot of cash and ornaments is concerned, it is ornamental only with a view to make the case grave. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 1 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T