← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5338/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Chandra Bhushan Kumar v. The Union Of India

2024-06-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5338 of 2020 ====================================================== Chandra Bhushan Kumar Son of Sona Lal Singh, P.O. Gateman (Traffic), Gosaigaon Hat Station, Resident of Village- Tinkoni, P.O. Tinkoni, P.S. Darpa, District- East Champaran at Motihari 845302 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Railways , Rail Bhawan, New Delhi 2.

The Executive Director, Estt. Railway Board, New Delhi. 3.

The General Manager, North East frontier Railways, Maligaon, Gauhati- 11 4.

The Divisional Railway Manager (P), N.F. Railways, Alipurduar Junction Alipur 5.

The Divisional Personal Officer/INF Railway Alipurduar Junction District 6.

The Station Superintendent NF Railway, Gosaigaone, Hat District. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Awadesh Kr. Pandey, Sr. CGC :

Mr.Ramtujabh Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-06-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner however, counsel for the Union of India is present.

2. Vide order dated 20.04.2024, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and

Patna High Court CWJC No.5338 of 2020(3) dt.20-06-2024 2/2 therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.

4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U