← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14828/2026allowed

Sujeet Kumar Jha @ Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-16Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14828 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2025 Thana- SIMRI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar Jha @ Sujeet Kumar Son of Guneshwar Jha Resident of Village - Sohijandih, P.S. - Hathauri, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the informant who is a truck driver was intercepted by a Scorpio vehicle and three persons from that Scorpio vehicle took Rs.30,000/- from the informant. It is further stated that the codriver of the truck took the snap of the Scorpio and on the basis of registration number, the Scorpio was searched and it was found in the house of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. One

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14828 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 Priyanshu Sarkar is the owner of the Scorpio and it is a case of road rage and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 29.12.2025.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 326 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Darbhanga. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T